Winner
Intel Core i5 3210M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3210M based on its power consumption.
See full details | Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD Opteron 2360 SE |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 12.39 pt/W |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 8,295 |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | More cores 4 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 85.31W | 3x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better performance per watt | 12.39 pt/W | vs | 1.84 pt/W | Around 6.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much better geekbench 3 single core score | 2,547 | vs | 1,183 | Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 3x more l3 cache per core | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 8,295 | vs | 5,193 | Around 60% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
summary | Core i5 3210M | vs | Opteron 2360 SE |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
F | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.39 pt/W | 1.84 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 85.31W |
details | Core i5 3210M | vs | Opteron 2360 SE |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 25 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.95 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.9 GHz | 2.95 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | HD 4000 | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | 11.0 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A |
Intel Core i5 3210M ![]() | AMD Opteron 2360 SE ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210M vs 4600M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210M vs 4500M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $225 | |
3210M vs 3337U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $225 | |
3210M vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210M vs 4400M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $80 | |
3210M vs 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $134 | |
3210M vs 2020M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||