CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3210M vs 5750M


Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Intel Core i5 3210M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3210M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Intel Core i5 3210M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 3210M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3210M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3210M

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 720 MHz Around 55% better turbo clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,524 vs 1,230 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 3.34 pt/$ vs 1.57 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
Better 3DMark11 physics score 3,130 vs 2,510 Around 25% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,948 vs 3,952 More than 25% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Front view of AMD A10 5750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Mar, 2013 vs Jun, 2012 Release date 9 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.12 GHz vs 2.88 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3210M vs A10 5750M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A10 5750M

GeekBench (64-bit)

A10 5750M

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

A10 5750M
Core i5 3210M A10 5750M @ community.futuremark.com

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A10 5750M


A10 5750M
Core i5 3210M A10 5750M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

A10 5750M

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i5 3210M  vs
A10 5750M 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes


Label HD 4000 Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 720 MHz


Core i5 3210M  vs
A10 5750M 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 105°C


Overclocked clock speed 2.88 GHz 3.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.88 GHz 3.12 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 13.78 pt/W 12.18 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W
Intel Core i5 3210M
Report a correction
AMD A10 5750M
Report a correction


Showing 4 comments.
e potencia el 3210m es mejor pero en grafica integrada el 5750m parte al 3210m
this page looks like intelboss.com, like gamespot was xboxspot years ago
yesssss........... CPUBOSS got mistaken
Intel Sucks shit...
comments powered by Disqus