CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2500K vs 980

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Core i5 2500K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2500K  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 2500K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500K

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better SysMark 2007 overall score 265 vs 215 Around 25% better SysMark 2007 overall score
Much better SysMark 2007 3D score 296 vs 205 Around 45% better SysMark 2007 3D score
Much better SysMark 2007 productivity score 273 vs 216 More than 25% better SysMark 2007 productivity score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,863 vs 1,324 More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 10,382 vs 6,132 Around 70% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Lower typical power consumption 112.55W vs 133.74W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,230 vs 4,260 More than 45% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better PassMark score 6,383 vs 4,674 More than 35% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.03 GHz vs 4.28 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 5,860 vs 4,289 More than 35% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Better cinebench r11.5 score 5.42 vs 4.37 Around 25% better cinebench r11.5 score
Better performance per watt 6.19 pt/W vs 3.79 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 110.03 $/year vs 144.19 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.1 GHz vs 4.62 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 Black 980

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 Black 980

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Marginally newer May, 2011 vs Jan, 2011 Release date 4 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2500K vs Phenom II X4 Black 980

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i5 2500K Phenom II X4 Black 980 @ community.futuremark.com

Cinebench R11.5

Limiting CINEBENCH to a single core and the performance of all of our processors is much more comparable.
Phenom II X4 Black 980 | by Legit Reviews (May, 2011)

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Core i5 2500K  vs Phenom II X4 Black 980 

9.0
8.0
In terms of 3D performance, the detail spec changes include an upgrade from DX10 to DX10.
Core i5 2500K

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 2500K  vs
Phenom II X4 Black 980 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1155
AM3
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 N/A
Latest DirectX 10.1 N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 850 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,275 N/A

details

Core i5 2500K  vs
Phenom II X4 Black 980 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 45 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclock popularity 3,179 29
Overclocked clock speed 5.03 GHz 4.28 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.1 GHz 4.62 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.03 GHz 4.28 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 125W
Annual home energy cost 41.29 $/year 39.65 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 110.03 $/year 144.19 $/year
Performance per watt 6.19 pt/W 3.79 pt/W
Peak power consumption 125.6W 164.6W
Typical power consumption 112.55W 133.74W
Intel Core i5 2500K
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II X4 Black 980
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus