0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 2500K vs AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2500K
- 3.3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 2500K
![]() | Is unlocked Yes |
by PCMag (Apr, 2011)In the PCMark Vantage full-system performance test, the Core i5-2500K earned an overall score of 10,271—not at all far behind the Core i7-2600K's result of 10,368, and surprisingly close (all things considered) to the 10,970 we saw with the Core i7-970—Intel's lower-end six-core LGA1366 CPU.
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
by Joel-Hruska (Jan, 2014)The results were impressive — our 45W Richland-based 6500T basically keeps pace with the Core i3-4330, while the A8-7600 is more than 50% faster, at 31 FPS.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B vs the Intel Core i5 2500K. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2500K vs PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 2500K
6,383
PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B
5,614
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 2500K
1,863
PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B
1,507
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 2500K | vs | PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 41.29 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 110.03 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.8 pt/W | 3.9 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 112.55W | 77.19W |
details | Core i5 2500K | vs | PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | None | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 28 nm | |
Operating temperature | 5 - 72.6°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.99 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.85 GHz | 4.81 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.99 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | Radeon™ R7 | |
Latest DirectX | 10.1 | 12.0 | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 720 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-2133 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 |
Intel Core i5 2500K ![]() | AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $185 | |
Intel Core i5 3570K vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $185 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$279 | $185 | |
Intel Core i7 2600K vs i5 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$207 | $185 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $185 | |
Intel Core i7 3770K vs i5 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $185 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $185 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Core i5 2500K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $300 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel N4200 vs Core i3 6100U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||