Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 2500

Front view of Intel Core i5 2500
Front view of Intel 6098P

Intel 6098P

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.86 pt/$ vs 2.12 pt/$ Around 35% better performance per dollar
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better performance per watt 9.04 pt/W vs 4.6 pt/W More than 95% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 5% better turbo clock speed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 66 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel 6098P

Reasons to consider the
Intel 6098P

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 77.19W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 4 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,271 vs 1,857 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz vs 3.7 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 22.89 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 83.22 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.57 GHz vs 4.21 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2500 vs 6098P

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i5 2500
6,257
6098P
5,918

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i5 2500
1,857
6098P
2,271

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i5 2500  vs
6098P 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 95W 54W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 47.3 $/year
Performance per watt 9.04 pt/W 4.6 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 43.88W

bus
Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 8,000 MT/s

details

 Core i5 2500  vs
6098P 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 66°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.7 GHz 4.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.21 GHz 4.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.7 GHz 4.13 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2000 Intel® HD Graphics 510
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 850 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Core i5 2500
Report a correction
Intel 6098P
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss