Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 0.4 GHz Around 8.2x higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.7 GHz vs 0.26 GHz More than 14x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.21 GHz vs 0.27 GHz More than 15.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Nov, 1998 Release date over 12 years later
Front view of AMD K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ vs the Intel Core i5 2500.

Features Key features of the Core i5 2500  vs K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ 

clock speed

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 2500  vs
K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 0.4 GHz

features

Has a NX bit Yes No

power consumption

Typical power consumption 77.19W N/A

details

Core i5 2500  vs
K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ 
Manufacture process 32 nm 250 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.7 GHz 0.26 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.21 GHz 0.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.7 GHz 0.26 GHz
Intel Core i5 2500
Report a correction
AMD K6-2 AMD-K6-2/400AFQ
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus