0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 2450M vs AMD E 450 |
Released January, 2012
Intel Core i5 2450M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 2450M
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 41.8 | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz |
![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 4,557 | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
VS
Released August, 2011
AMD E 450
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E 450
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 14.63W | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 2450MCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 41.8 | vs | 18.4 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 3.1 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 4,557 | vs | 1,056 | More than 4.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,300 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 2.2x better turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 19.45 pt/W | vs | 2.98 pt/W | More than 6.5x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,752 | vs | 1,127 | Around 4.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,403 | vs | 431 | More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l3 cache per core | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 508 MHz | Around 30% higher GPU clock speed | |||
More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 90 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | Jan, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2011 | Release date 4 months later | |||
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 28.44W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2450M vs E 450
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Core i5 2450M
2,162
E 450
1,112
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2450M
4,752
E 450
1,127
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2450M
2,246
E 450
642
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2450M
1,980,000 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2450M
4,557
E 450
1,056
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2450M
5,122
E 450
1,181
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 2450M
3,403
E 450
770
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 2450M
1,403
E 450
431
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 2450M | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.1 GHz | None | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
Super 7 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 |
details | Core i5 2450M | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 25 | 25 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | Radeon™ HD 6320 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 508 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,300 MHz | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 19.45 pt/W | 2.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 14.63W |
Intel Core i5 2450M ![]() | AMD E 450 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
450 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
450 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $130 | |
2450M vs 3210M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $225 | |
2450M vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $250 | |
2450M vs 2520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $281 | |
2450M vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $281 | |
2450M vs 5200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||