Winner
Intel Core M3-6Y30
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core M3-6Y30 based on its power consumption.
See full details | Intel Core i5 2410M vs M3-6Y30 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ | ![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 16.38 mPixels/s | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 30.69 pt/W | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.66W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
9.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Core M3-6Y30CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 0.9 GHz | More than 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.19 pt/$ | vs | 0.49 pt/$ | Around 4.5x better performance per dollar | |||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | More than 40% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.64 GHz | vs | 2.02 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,327 | vs | 1,183 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| |||||||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 16.38 mPixels/s | vs | 1.4 mPixels/s | Around 11.8x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per watt | 30.69 pt/W | vs | 14.07 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 3.66W | vs | 28.44W | 7.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Feb, 2011 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 1.08 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 7.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 3.94 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 7.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Core i5 2410M | vs | M3-6Y30 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 0.9 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 4.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 1.08 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 3.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 14.07 pt/W | 30.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 3.66W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 4,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 2410M | vs | M3-6Y30 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.64 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.64 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 300 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | 850 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Core i5 2410M ![]() | Intel Core M3-6Y30 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 4300U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 4020Y | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
M3-6Y30 vs 5Y10 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 6100U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 5200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs M5-6Y54 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||