CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2410M vs M3-6Y30 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i5 2410M
3.5
Core M3-6Y30
5.3
Core i5 6200U
5.4
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Core i5 2410M
6.9
Core M3-6Y30
6.3
Core i5 6200U
6.6
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i5 2410M
n.d.
Core M3-6Y30
n.d.
Core i5 6200U
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i5 2410M
5.3
Core M3-6Y30
6.8
Core i5 6200U
6.5
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i5 2410M
5.5
Core M3-6Y30
9.7
Core i5 6200U
6.4
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i5 2410M
n.d.
Core M3-6Y30
n.d.
Core i5 6200U
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
9.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Core i5 2410M
7.3
Core M3-6Y30
9.4
Core i5 6200U
8.3

Winner
Intel Core M3-6Y30 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core M3-6Y30  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 2410M

Front view of Intel Core i5 2410M
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Intel Core M3-6Y30

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 2410M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2410M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 30% higher turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ vs 0.49 pt/$ Around 4.5x better performance per dollar
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 850 MHz More than 40% better turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.64 GHz vs 2.02 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,327 vs 1,183 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M3-6Y30

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 16.38 mPixels/s vs 1.4 mPixels/s Around 11.8x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 30.69 pt/W vs 14.07 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.66W vs 28.44W 7.8x lower typical power consumption
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Feb, 2011 Release date over 4 years later
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 7.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 7.8x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2410M vs M3-6Y30

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 2410M
1.4 mPixels/s
Core M3-6Y30
16.38 mPixels/s

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 2410M
4,274
Core M3-6Y30
4,647.5

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 2410M
2,068
Core M3-6Y30
2,388.5

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 2410M
1,340,000 MB/s
Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i5 2410M
3,161
Core M3-6Y30
3,056

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i5 2410M
1,327
Core M3-6Y30
1,183

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i5 2410M  vs
M3-6Y30 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 0.9 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 35W 4.5W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 1.08 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 3.94 $/year
Performance per watt 14.07 pt/W 30.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 3.66W

bus
Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 4,000 MT/s

details

 Core i5 2410M  vs
M3-6Y30 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.64 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.64 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Intel® HD Graphics 515
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz 850 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i5 2410M
Report a correction
Intel Core M3-6Y30
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss