0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 2410M vs M3-6Y30 |
Released February, 2011
Intel Core i5 2410M
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 2410M
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ | ![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core M3-6Y30
- 0.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the M3-6Y30
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 16.38 mPixels/s | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 30.69 pt/W | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.66W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Core M3-6Y30CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 0.9 GHz | More than 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.19 pt/$ | vs | 0.49 pt/$ | Around 4.5x better performance per dollar | |||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | More than 40% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.64 GHz | vs | 2.02 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,327 | vs | 1,183 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| |||||||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 16.38 mPixels/s | vs | 1.4 mPixels/s | Around 11.8x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per watt | 30.69 pt/W | vs | 14.07 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 3.66W | vs | 28.44W | 7.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Feb, 2011 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 1.08 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 7.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 3.94 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 7.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2410M vs M3-6Y30
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Core i5 2410M
1.4 mPixels/s
Core M3-6Y30
16.38 mPixels/s
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2410M
4,274
Core M3-6Y30
4,647.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2410M
2,068
Core M3-6Y30
2,388.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2410M
1,340,000 MB/s
Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 2410M
3,161
Core M3-6Y30
3,056
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 2410M
1,327
Core M3-6Y30
1,183
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 2410M | vs | M3-6Y30 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 0.9 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 4.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 1.08 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 3.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 14.07 pt/W | 30.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 3.66W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 4,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 2410M | vs | M3-6Y30 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.64 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.64 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 300 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | 850 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Core i5 2410M ![]() | Intel Core M3-6Y30 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 4300U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 4020Y | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
M3-6Y30 vs 5Y10 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 6100U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 5200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs M5-6Y54 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||