CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2410M vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 2410M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2410M  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 2410M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 2410M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 2410M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2410M

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 4.2x better performance per dollar
Higher turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 40% better turbo clock speed
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 1.4 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s More than 3.5x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 14.07 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,327 vs 534 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,274 vs 2,927 More than 45% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.64 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Feb, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 5% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2410M vs Celeron J1900

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 2410M
1.4 mPixels/s
Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 2410M
1,340,000 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 2410M  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i5 2410M  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.64 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.64 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 10W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 14.07 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i5 2410M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus