Winner
Intel Core i3 6100
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 6100 based on its single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details Intel Core i5 2400 vs i3 6100 |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2400
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
9.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 2400
 | Much better performance per dollar 4.58 pt/$ | | Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz |
| | More l3 cache 6 MB | | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100
- 3.7 GHz
- Dual core
9.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the i3 6100
| | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 41.44W | | More number of displays supported 3 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2400 vs 6100 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i3 6100CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 4.58 pt/$ | vs | 1.84 pt/$ | Around 2.5x better performance per dollar | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 3 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 8.14 pt/W | vs | 4.51 pt/W | More than 80% better performance per watt | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.6 °C | vs | 65 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 41.44W | vs | 93.6W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,106 | vs | 1,742 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 3.54 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 12.29 $/year | vs | 27.75 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 44.68 $/year | vs | 100.92 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.39 GHz | vs | 3.51 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2400 vs i3 6100
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 2400 | vs | i3 6100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 51W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.75 $/year | 12.29 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.92 $/year | 44.68 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 8.14 pt/W | 4.51 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.6W | 41.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 2400 | vs | i3 6100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.54 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.51 GHz | 4.39 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.54 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 2400  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 6100 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $63 | $125 | |
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs Core i3 6100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $187 | $125 | |
| Intel Core i5 6400 vs i3 6100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $100 | $125 | |
| AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i3 6100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $190 | $125 | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs i3 6100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $117 | $125 | |
| Intel Core i3 4170 vs 6100 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | $205 | |
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs 2400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $205 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs i5 2400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
