0 Comments
| | Intel Core i5 2400 vs i3 4150 |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2400
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 2400
| | More l3 cache 6 MB | | More cores 4 |
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Released February, 2014
Intel Core i3 4150
- 3.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the i3 4150
| | Is hyperthreaded Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 43.88W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 3 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Better geekbench (64-bit) score | 9,188 | vs | 6,906 | Around 35% better geekbench (64-bit) score | |||
| |||||||
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 93.6W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Marginally newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 100.92 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 27.75 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2400 vs i3 4150
GeekBench
Core i5 2400
10,769
Core i3 4150
6,906
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 2400 | vs | i3 4150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| LGA 1150 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 54W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.75 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.92 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.6W | 43.88W | |
bus | |||
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 2400 | vs | i3 4150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 31 | 35 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Intel Core i5 2400 | Intel Core i3 4150 |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $120 | $110 | |
| 4150 vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $114 | |
| 4150 vs 4130 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $195 | |
| 4150 vs 4460 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $70 | |
| 4150 vs G3258 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $138 | |
| 4150 vs 4330 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $130 | |
| 4150 vs 4160 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $100 | |
| 4150 vs G3240 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $325 | $242 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $97 | |
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| 5 Octa vs 800 | ||





