0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 2400 vs i3 4130 |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2400
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 2400
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.54 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4130
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the i3 4130
![]() | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 2400CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.54 GHz | vs | 3.47 GHz | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 1,100 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 93.6W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 100.92 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 27.75 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 2 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 2400 vs i3 4130
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2400
8,298
Core i3 4130
6,330
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2400
2,638
Core i3 4130
2,982
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2400
2,260,000 MB/s
Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2400
8,258
Core i3 4130
6,256
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 2400
9,093
Core i3 4130
6,772
GeekBench
Core i5 2400
10,769
Core i3 4130
6,772
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 2400
5,901
Core i3 4130
4,786
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 2400
1,742
Core i3 4130
1,963
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 2400 | vs | i3 4130 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 54W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.75 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.92 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.14 pt/W | 13.06 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 93.6W | 43.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 2400 | vs | i3 4130 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.54 GHz | 3.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.51 GHz | 3.58 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,244.5 | 1,786.7 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.54 GHz | 3.47 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Core i5 2400 ![]() | Intel Core i3 4130 ![]() |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 22 desktops with the Intel Core i5 2400, starting from $138
- 2 desktops with the Intel Core i3 4130, starting from $215
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $180 | |
2400 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $125 | |
2400 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $305 | |
2400 vs 2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $180 | |
4130 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $100 | |
4130 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $75 | |
4130 vs G3250 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||