Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 6300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 11 years later
Lower typical power consumption 41.44W vs 59.31W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.37 GHz vs 3.69 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.62 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year vs 17.59 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year vs 63.95 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron D 335

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 335

Report a correction
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 67 °C vs 65 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Features Key features of the Core i3 6300  vs Celeron D 335 

clock speed

Core i3 6300
3.8 GHz
Celeron D 335
2.8 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i3 6300
4.37 GHz
Celeron D 335
3.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i3 6300
4.62 GHz
Celeron D 335
2.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 6300  vs
Celeron D 335 
Clock speed 3.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 51W 73W
Annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year 63.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 41.44W 59.31W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 6300  vs
Celeron D 335 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
Manufacture process 14 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.37 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.62 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.37 GHz 3.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC Yes No
Intel Core i3 6300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 335
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus