CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6100U vs E3827 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Atom E3827
n.d.
N4200
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Atom E3827
n.d.
N4200
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 6100U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 6100U  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 6100U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 6100U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 6100U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 144.53 fps vs 32.06 fps More than 4.5x better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 792 MHz More than 25% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,332 vs 398 More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per watt 7.99 pt/W vs 4.49 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 3,873 vs 849 More than 4.5x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom E3827

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3827

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 542 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 80% higher GPU clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 0.88 pt/$ vs 0.43 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 6.5W vs 12.19W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year vs 13.14 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 3.61 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 6100U vs Atom E3827

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 6100U
144.53 fps
Atom E3827
32.06 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 6100U  vs
Atom E3827 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.75 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 15W 8W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 1.93 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 7.01 $/year
Performance per watt 7.99 pt/W 4.49 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 6.5W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 6100U  vs
Atom E3827 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 1.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 HD
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 542 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i3 6100U
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3827
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus