Winner
Intel Core i3 6100U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 6100U based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel Core i3 6100U vs AMD A10 6th Gen A10-8700P |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
8.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 6100U
 | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 39.3 | | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | | More l3 cache 3 MB |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD A10 6th Gen A10-8700P
- 1.8 GHz
- Quad core
8.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 6th Gen A10-8700P
| | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much higher GPU clock speed 800 MHz |
| | Much better performance per watt 13.95 pt/W | | More cores 4 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6100U vs 6th Gen A10-8700P among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 39.3 | vs | 33 | Around 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | Around 2.8x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 13.95 pt/W | vs | 7.99 pt/W | Around 75% better performance per watt | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | 13.18 fps | vs | 10.58 fps | Around 25% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.56 GHz | vs | 2.31 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 6100U vs A10 6th Gen A10-8700P
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 6100U | vs | A10 6th Gen A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 15W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.99 pt/W | 13.95 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 12.19W | |
details | Core i3 6100U | vs | A10 6th Gen A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | None | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 28 nm | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.31 GHz | 2.56 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.31 GHz | 2.56 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | Radeon™ R6 | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-2133 | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
 Intel Core i3 6100U  Report a correction |  AMD A10 6th Gen A10-8700P Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6100U vs N4200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $281 | |
| 6100U vs 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $275 | |
| 6100U vs 5005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6100U vs 7100U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $281 | |
| 6100U vs M3-6Y30 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6th Gen A10-8700P vs 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6th Gen A10-8700P vs 5200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
