0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 6100T vs 6100 |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100T
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 6100T
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100
- 3.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 6100
![]() | Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz | ![]() | Better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz |
![]() | Significantly better performance per dollar 1.84 pt/$ | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Core i3 6100CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 41.44W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 12.29 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 44.68 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly better performance per dollar | 1.84 pt/$ | vs | 1.48 pt/$ | Around 25% better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 3.21 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,106 | vs | 1,825 | More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.39 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 6100T vs 6100
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 6100T
4,837
Core i3 6100
5,478
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 6100T
1,825
Core i3 6100
2,106
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 6100T | vs | 6100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 51W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 12.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 44.68 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.96 pt/W | 4.51 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 41.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s |
details | Core i3 6100T | vs | 6100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 66°C | Unknown - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.21 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 4.39 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.21 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Core i3 6100T ![]() | Intel Core i3 6100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $63 | |
6100 vs G4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $187 | |
6100 vs 6400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $100 | |
6100 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $190 | |
6100 vs 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $117 | |
6100 vs 4170 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $180 | |
6100 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $401 | |
6100 vs 6500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||