Intel Core i3 6100T vs 6100 |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100T
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 6100T
 | Lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year |
| | Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100
- 3.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 6100
| | Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz | | Better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz |
| | Significantly better performance per dollar 1.84 pt/$ | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i3 6100CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 41.44W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 12.29 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 44.68 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 1.84 pt/$ | vs | 1.48 pt/$ | Around 25% better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 3.21 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,106 | vs | 1,825 | More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.39 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 6100T vs 6100
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 6100T | vs | 6100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 51W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 12.29 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 44.68 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.96 pt/W | 4.51 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 41.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i3 6100T | vs | 6100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 66°C | Unknown - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.21 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 4.39 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.21 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel Core i3 6100T  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 6100 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $63 | |
| 6100 vs G4400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $187 | |
| 6100 vs 6400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $100 | |
| 6100 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $190 | |
| 6100 vs 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $117 | |
| 6100 vs 4170 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $180 | |
| 6100 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $401 | |
| 6100 vs 6500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
