CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6100 vs 3220 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 6100 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 6100  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 1.84 pt/$ vs 1.18 pt/$ More than 55% better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz vs 3.43 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,106 vs 1,764 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 4.51 pt/W vs 2.69 pt/W Around 70% better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 5,478 vs 4,229 Around 30% better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.39 GHz vs 3.46 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 85% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 6100 vs 3220

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 6100  vs
3220 
Clock speed 3.7 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 51W 55W
Annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 4.51 pt/W 2.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 41.44W 44.69W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 6100  vs
3220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L3 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 65.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.25 GHz 3.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.39 GHz 3.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz 3.43 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus