Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 0 MHz Compared to all cpus, 350 MHz GPU clock speed is just OK
More l3 cache 3 MB vs None Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD E1 E1 Micro-6200T

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 E1 Micro-6200T

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 3.21W vs 41.44W 12.9x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.95 $/year vs 12.29 $/year 12.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 3.46 $/year vs 44.68 $/year 12.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Core i3 6100  vs E1 E1 Micro-6200T 

clock speed

gpu clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 6100  vs
E1 E1 Micro-6200T 
Clock speed 3.7 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

details

Core i3 6100  vs
E1 E1 Micro-6200T 
Threads 4 2
L3 cache 3 MB None
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 Radeon™ R2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 0 MHz

power consumption

TDP 51W 3.95W
Annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year 0.95 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year 3.46 $/year
Typical power consumption 41.44W 3.21W
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction
AMD E1 E1 Micro-6200T
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus