Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 1.67 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+ vs the Intel Core i3 6100.

Features Key features of the Core i3 6100  vs Athlon XP-M 2000+ 

clock speed

Core i3 6100
3.7 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 6100  vs
Athlon XP-M 2000+ 
Clock speed 3.7 GHz 1.67 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i3 6100  vs
Athlon XP-M 2000+ 
Threads 4 1
Manufacture process 14 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 41.44W N/A
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus