CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6100 vs 7600 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,106 vs 1,541 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower typical power consumption 41.44W vs 52.81W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jul, 2014 Release date 11 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.43 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A8 7600

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 7600

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 9.59 pt/$ vs 2.3 pt/$ Around 4.2x better performance per dollar
Much higher GPU clock speed 720 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 2x higher GPU clock speed
Better performance per watt 8.07 pt/W vs 4.51 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 71.3 °C vs 65 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 6100 vs A8 7600

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 6100
5,478
A8 7600
5,126

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 6100
2,106
A8 7600
1,541

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 6100  vs
A8 7600 
Clock speed 3.7 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0

power consumption

TDP 51W 65W
Annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 4.51 pt/W 8.07 pt/W
Typical power consumption 41.44W 52.81W

details

Core i3 6100  vs
A8 7600 
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.26 GHz 4.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.43 GHz 3.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.26 GHz 4.04 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 Radeon™ R7
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 34,133.32 MB/s
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction
AMD A8 7600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus