Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 560

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 560

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 560

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.33 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 4,338 vs 948 More than 4.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,432 vs 981 More than 4.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,367 vs 666 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 59.31W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 72.6 °C Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 17.59 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 560 vs Celeron 560

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 560
141,400 MB/s
Celeron 560
85,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Core i3 560
5,289
Celeron 560
1,545

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 560  vs
Celeron 560 
Clock speed 3.33 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1156
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 560  vs
Celeron 560 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.65 - 1.4V 0.95 - 1.3V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 733 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 73W 31W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 27.16 $/year
Performance per watt 2.17 pt/W 2.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 59.31W 25.19W
Intel Core i3 560
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus