Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 560

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 62.5 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower typical power consumption 59.31W vs 77.19W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year vs 22.89 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year vs 83.22 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
More cores 6 vs 2 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.75 GHz vs 4.03 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.82 GHz vs 3.33 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jul, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 560 vs FX 6300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 560
4,432
FX 6300
7,871

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 560
2,022
FX 6300
2,053

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 560
141,400 MB/s
FX 6300
2,290,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 560
4,338
FX 6300
7,447

GeekBench

Core i3 560
5,289
FX 6300
9,503

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 560
2,961
FX 6300
6,444

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 560
1,367
FX 6300
1,446

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 560  vs
FX 6300 
Clock speed 3.33 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 1156
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 733 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Core i3 560  vs
FX 6300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 6
L2 cache 1 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.33 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.65 - 1.4V 0.8 - 1.43V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 62.5°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 2 82
Overclocked clock speed 4.03 GHz 4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.33 GHz 4.82 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz 4.75 GHz

power consumption

TDP 73W 95W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 2.17 pt/W 9.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 59.31W 77.19W
Intel Core i3 560
Report a correction
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus