Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 530

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz vs 3.23 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 69.1 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 3.23 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower typical power consumption 92.5W vs 98.28W More than 5% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 35.3 $/year vs 37.88 $/year More than 5% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 88.48 $/year vs 93.47 $/year More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2100

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 16,773.12 MB Supports more than 95% more RAM
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jan, 2010 Release date a year later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 530 vs 2100

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 530
123,800 MB/s
Core i3 2100
153,100 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 530  vs
2100 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1156
LGA 1155
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 65W
Annual home energy cost 35.3 $/year 37.88 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 88.48 $/year 93.47 $/year
Performance per watt 1.21 pt/W 1.41 pt/W
Idle power consumption 67W 73W
Peak power consumption 101W 106.7W
Typical power consumption 92.5W 98.28W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 530  vs
2100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 31
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 69.1°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 13 101
Overclocked clock speed 4.31 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz 3.23 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,953.6 1,518.9
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz 3.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 733 MHz 850 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,773.12 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i3 530
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus