Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 530

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 530

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 1.86 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz vs 1.87 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 733 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 45% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Slightly more l3 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Better performance per dollar 1.14 pt/$ vs 0.89 pt/$ Around 30% better performance per dollar
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,112 vs 762 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better PassMark score 2,584 vs 994 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron P4505

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron P4505

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 92.5W 3.3x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 35.3 $/year 4.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 88.48 $/year 2.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 530 vs Celeron P4505

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 530  vs
Celeron P4505 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1156
BGA 1288

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 35W
Annual home energy cost 35.3 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 88.48 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.21 pt/W 1.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 92.5W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i3 530  vs
Celeron P4505 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 382,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 14

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.31 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 733 MHz 500 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,773.12 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i3 530
Report a correction
Intel Celeron P4505
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus