Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 530

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 530

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 123,800 MB/s vs 90,200 MB/s More than 35% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.88 pt/$ vs 0.61 pt/$ Around 45% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion II P520

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion II P520

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 92.5W 4.6x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.53 pt/W vs 1.21 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 35.3 $/year 5.9x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 88.48 $/year 4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer May, 2010 vs Jan, 2010 Release date 4 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 530 vs Turion II P520

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 530
123,800 MB/s
Turion II P520
90,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 530  vs
Turion II P520 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1156
S1
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 25W
Annual home energy cost 35.3 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 88.48 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 1.21 pt/W 3.53 pt/W
Typical power consumption 92.5W 20.31W

details

Core i3 530  vs
Turion II P520 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.34 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz 2.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 733 MHz N/A
Intel Core i3 530
Report a correction
AMD Turion II P520
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus