Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 530

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better PassMark score 2,584 vs 1,436 Around 80% better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,112 vs 800 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,755 vs 2,093 Around 80% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz vs 3.28 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 1.21 pt/W vs 1.14 pt/W More than 5% better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 71.5 °C Almost the same
Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 92.5W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 35.3 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Nov, 2019 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 10 years later
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 88.48 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 530 vs E2 3200

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 530
3,755
E2 3200
2,093

GeekBench

Core i3 530
5,758
E2 3200
2,093

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 530
2,584
E2 3200
1,436

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 530
1,112
E2 3200
800

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 530  vs
E2 3200 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6370D

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Core i3 530  vs
E2 3200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.65 - 1.4V 0.91 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 71.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.31 GHz 3.28 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz 3.28 GHz

power consumption

TDP 73W 65W
Annual home energy cost 35.3 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 88.48 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.21 pt/W 1.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 92.5W 52.81W
Intel Core i3 530
Report a correction
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus