Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4330T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4330T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 9 months later
Front view of AMD A10 5700

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5700

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much higher GPU clock speed 760 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 3.8x higher GPU clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.17 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 71.3 °C vs 66.4 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4330T vs A10 5700

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5700
5,046

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5700
5,277

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5700
1,911

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4330T
2,870 MB/s
A10 5700
2,190,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5700
5,135

GeekBench

A10 5700
5,583

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A10 5700
4,200

PassMark (Single Core)

A10 5700
1,359

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4330T  vs
A10 5700 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 4.54 pt/W 7.78 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W

details

Core i3 4330T  vs
A10 5700 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.4°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3 GHz 4.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz 4.17 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ HD 7660D
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 760 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Intel Core i3 4330T
Report a correction
AMD A10 5700
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus