Intel Core i3 4330  vs AMD A10 7850K 

what gen is the intel i3 4330

my advise wait for excavator and keep an eye on it as for amd there doing something clever there using fm2 plus etc as testing ground on there newer chips kaveri to determine if it has a good performance thats why they didnt release a kaveri for am3 plus because there was hardly any change in cpu tech and hit a barrier amd excavator will do better well just have to wait and see how well it does. and hopefully at 20nm

9590 is over power hungry and a serious pain to cool the 9000 series are same as 8350 or 8320 just higher clocked and run very innefficiently performance per watt the only decent amd cpu is fx 6300

well the APU focuses on the gpus more on the other hand intel focuses on the CPU so the cpu is stronger and the gpu is stronger for the apu get it?

i would never get a I3 this is stupid the AMD is much better then a I3 but i just got done building my PC and i used a I5 4670K i like my computer and i am surprised i have only used AMD but i didn't have the money to buy the AMD FX 9590 so i choose a Intel 4th gen i5 4670K with a GTX 760 and it does great on my 1920X1080 but i would love to had the money to build a AMD computer maybe next time

Now AMD is a winner so I don't think it has anything to do with them being fans of Intel... it only depends on the amount of votes here. I think that to most of ordinary(not developwers, who need a lot of cores and extreme multitasking) people single and dual core perfomance is much more important than having 4 slower cores separately. Games nor other normal programs(most of them) don't take advantage of using 4 cores a once, also Hyper-threading makes Core i3 not a lot slower in multitasking either, but it really wins in usual single and dual-core tasks. Also of course MUCH lower power consumption(which means you won't need as fast and loud cooler and your energ expenses will be lower than with AMD. MY vote if for Intel If you're a developer and need extreme multitasking all the time I'd go with 6-8cores AMD or Core i7. For more basic tasks and using it at home I'd definitely go with an i3, inexpensive, cool processor which is great in single and dual core perfomance, and decent at quad-core perfomance

Intel biased site. Intel could be a sponsor of the site, as even amongst Intel vs Intel there is a bias toward the newer CPUs even if the last gen has similar or still slightly better performance. It seems CPU Boss focuses only on the single core performance of a CPU to declare a winner. That being the case, I don't see why they bother with other benchmarks since it's not a fair comparison nomatter what CPUs you're comparing.

Low power consumption

Better single core performance, significantly lower running cost?

that i3 model is new 4 generation or latest core model from intel.

The A10 has a stronger CPU and GPU, why did the i3 win?