Intel Core i3 4170 vs 6098P |
Released January, 2015
Intel Core i3 4170
- 3.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4170
 | Much better performance per dollar 7.12 pt/$ | | Much better performance per watt 15.43 pt/W |
| | Better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C |
VS
Released October, 2015
Intel 6098P
- 3.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 6098P
| | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz |
| | Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,271 | | Newer Oct, 2015 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 7.12 pt/$ | vs | 2.12 pt/$ | More than 3.2x better performance per dollar | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 15.43 pt/W | vs | 4.6 pt/W | More than 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 66 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.13 GHz | vs | 3.8 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,271 | vs | 2,130 | More than 5% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.57 GHz | vs | 3.83 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4170 vs 6098P
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4170 | vs | 6098P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 54W | 54W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 15.43 pt/W | 4.6 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 43.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
| Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i3 4170 | vs | 6098P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 66°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | 4.57 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.8 GHz | 4.13 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel Core i3 4170  Report a correction |  Intel 6098P Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $117 | $125 | |
| 4170 vs 6100 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $117 | $190 | |
| 4170 vs 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $117 | $120 | |
| 4170 vs 4160 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $117 | $64 | |
| 4170 vs G3260 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $117 | $100 | |
| 4170 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $117 | $70 | |
| 4170 vs G3258 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $117 | $180 | |
| 4170 vs 3470 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
