Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 4158U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 4158U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4158U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4158U

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 33.32 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 7.8x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 2.96 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 5.8x better performance per dollar
Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 854 MHz Around 30% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,851 vs 924 More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,884 vs 2,927 Around 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 3.5x higher GPU clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 22.75W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 6.75 $/year 2.8x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 24.53 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4158U vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4158U
2,470,000 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4158U  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® Iris™ Graphics 5100 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i3 4158U  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 28W 10W
Annual home energy cost 6.75 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 24.53 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 33.32 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 22.75W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i3 4158U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus