0 Comments
| | Intel Core i3 4150 vs AMD Athlon X4 760K |
Released February, 2014
Intel Core i3 4150
- 3.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4150
| | Is hyperthreaded Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 43.88W | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year |
VS
First seen on June, 2013
AMD Athlon X4 760K
- 3.8 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon X4 760K
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Higher clock speed 3.8 GHz |
| | More cores 4 | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
by Fudzilla-staff (Jun, 2013)It supports DDR3-1866 memory and the rest of the feature set is basically a carbon copy of what you’d get with an A-series Richland part, sans graphics.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 81.25W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 87.6 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 24.09 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4150 vs Athlon X4 760K
GeekBench
Core i3 4150
6,906
Athlon X4 760K
5,671
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4150 | vs | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Core i3 4150 | vs | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 54W | 100W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 24.09 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 87.6 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 81.25W | |
| Intel Core i3 4150 | AMD Athlon X4 760K |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $110 | $120 | |
| AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i3 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $120 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs i3 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $70 | $120 | |
| Intel G3258 vs Core i3 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $138 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i3 4330 vs 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $70 | $75 | |
| Intel G3258 vs AMD Athlon X4 760K | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | $75 | |
| AMD FX 6300 vs Athlon X4 760K | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $249 | $325 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| Intel N3530 vs Core i3 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| $340 | $325 | |
| Intel 4790K vs Core i7 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2830 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $97 | $281 | |
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
| VS | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa | ||





