0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs Atom C2750 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4130
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4130
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 7.2 pt/$ | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2750
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2750
![]() | More cores 8 | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 16.25W |
![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 97 °C | ![]() | More threads 8 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 7.2 pt/$ | vs | 1.38 pt/$ | Around 5.2x better performance per dollar | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,963 | vs | 579 | Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.47 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | vs | 11.79 pt/W | More than 10% better performance per watt | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.58 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
More cores | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 43.88W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 97 °C | vs | 72 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 6,808 | vs | 6,330 | Around 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 13.01 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 47.3 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4130 vs Atom C2750
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 4130
6,330
Atom C2750
6,808
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 4130
2,982
Atom C2750
1,089
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s
Atom C2750
412,200 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 4130
4,786
Atom C2750
3,344
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 4130
1,963
Atom C2750
579
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4130 | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 54W | 20W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | 11.79 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 16.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 0 | 1 |
details | Core i3 4130 | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 97°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.47 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.58 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.47 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
Intel Core i3 4130 ![]() | Intel Atom C2750 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $100 | |
4130 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $75 | |
4130 vs G3250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3258 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $125 | |
4130 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $205 | |
4130 vs 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $180 | |
4130 vs 3470 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||