Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 4130

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Core i3 4130
Front view of Intel Atom C2750

Intel Atom C2750

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4130

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4130

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 7.2 pt/$ vs 1.38 pt/$ Around 5.2x better performance per dollar
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,963 vs 579 Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.47 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 13.06 pt/W vs 11.79 pt/W More than 10% better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.58 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom C2750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2750

Report a correction
More cores 8 vs 2 6 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly lower typical power consumption 16.25W vs 43.88W 2.7x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 97 °C vs 72 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 6,808 vs 6,330 Around 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 13.01 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year vs 47.3 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4130 vs Atom C2750

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4130
6,330
Atom C2750
6,808

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4130
2,982
Atom C2750
1,089

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s
Atom C2750
412,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 4130
4,786
Atom C2750
3,344

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 4130
1,963
Atom C2750
579

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i3 4130  vs
Atom C2750 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Octa core

features
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption
TDP 54W 20W
Annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year 17.52 $/year
Performance per watt 13.06 pt/W 11.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.88W 16.25W

bus
Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 0 1

details

 Core i3 4130  vs
Atom C2750 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 97°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.47 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.58 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.47 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD graphics 4400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Core i3 4130
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2750
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss