0 Comments
| | Intel Core i3 4130 vs AMD FX 4350 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4130
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4130
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Is hyperthreaded Yes |
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W |
VS
Released April, 2013
AMD FX 4350
- 4.2 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 4350
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | Significantly higher clock speed 4.2 GHz | | Significantly more l3 cache 8 MB |
by Tarun-Iyer (Apr, 2013)A summary of the new processors' specifications and their respective retail prices are tabulated below.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4130 vs 4350
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i3 4130 6.6 FX 4350 6.7 | |
| Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i3 4130 9.3 FX 4350 8.3 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i3 4130 6.6 FX 4350 9.9 | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i3 4130 8.1 FX 4350 8.3 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 101.56W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,979 | vs | 1,524 | Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 14.17 pt/W | vs | 6.26 pt/W | More than 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Marginally newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Apr, 2013 | Release date 2 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 5.1 GHz | vs | 3.49 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.16 GHz | vs | 3.47 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 7.24 pt/$ | vs | 6.7 pt/$ | Around 10% better performance per dollar | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4130 vs FX 4350
GeekBench
Core i3 4130
6,792
FX 4350
6,114
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4130 | vs | FX 4350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
details | Core i3 4130 | vs | FX 4350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.49 GHz | 5.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.47 GHz | 5.16 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.49 GHz | 5.1 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 54W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 14.17 pt/W | 6.26 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 101.56W | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 | AMD FX 4350 |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $114 | $110 | |
| 4130 vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $70 | |
| 4130 vs G3258 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $120 | |
| 4130 vs 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $60 | |
| 4130 vs G3220 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $99 | |
| 4130 vs 6600K | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $125 | |
| 4130 vs 3220 | ||
| VS | |
| $108 | $110 | |
| 4350 vs 6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $325 | $253 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $105 | |
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| 5 Octa vs 800 | ||





