Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4130

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4130

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 101.56W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 109.5 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 30.11 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 70 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Aug, 2012 Release date 10 months later
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Significantly higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.41 GHz vs 3.47 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.69 GHz vs 3.58 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4130 vs FX 4130

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4130
6,330
FX 4130
5,382

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4130
2,982
FX 4130
1,861

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s
FX 4130
2,150,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 4130
4,786
FX 4130
4,157

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 4130
1,963
FX 4130
1,250

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4130  vs
FX 4130 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 54W 125W
Annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 13.06 pt/W 6.77 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.88W 101.56W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 HyperTransport 3.1

details

Core i3 4130  vs
FX 4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.47 GHz 4.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.58 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.47 GHz 4.41 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD graphics 4400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Intel Core i3 4130
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus