Intel Core i3 4130 vs AMD A6 6400B |
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4130
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4130
 | Much more l3 cache 3 MB | | More threads 4 |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Lower typical power consumption 43.88W |
VS
Released June, 2013
AMD A6 6400B
- 3.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD A6 6400B
| | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | | Significantly higher clock speed 3.9 GHz |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.9 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.47 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 72 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.58 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4130 vs A6 6400B
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4130 | vs | A6 6400B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| ABM | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 54W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | 1.91 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 52.81W | |
details | Core i3 4130 | vs | A6 6400B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | None | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.47 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.58 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.47 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | Radeon™ HD 8470D | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 800 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
 Intel Core i3 4130  Report a correction |  AMD A6 6400B Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $70 | $98 | |
| G3220 vs 4130 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $98 | |
| G3250 vs 4130 | ||
 | VS | |
| $100 | $98 | |
| 6300 vs 4130 | ||
 | VS | |
| $70 | $98 | |
| G3258 vs 4130 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $98 | |
| 2400 vs 4130 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $98 | |
| 3470 vs 4130 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $98 | |
| 3220 vs 4130 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
