0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 4020Y vs Atom x5 x5-Z8500 |
Released September, 2013
Intel Core i3 4020Y
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4020Y
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 27.1 | ![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 11.47 mPixels/s |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,570 |
VS
Released January, 2015
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8500
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom x5 x5-Z8500
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.39 pt/$ | ![]() | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 4020YCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 27.1 | vs | 13.8 | More than 95% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 11.47 mPixels/s | vs | 4.98 mPixels/s | More than 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,570 | vs | 890 | More than 75% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.39 pt/$ | vs | 1.95 pt/$ | Around 25% better performance per dollar | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.24 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer | Jan, 2015 | vs | Sep, 2013 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4020Y vs Atom x5 x5-Z8500
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i3 4020Y
10.74 mHash/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
6.89 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Core i3 4020Y
11.47 mPixels/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
4.98 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i3 4020Y
0.9 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
0.51 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 4020Y
3,238
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
2,882
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 4020Y
1,570
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
890
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 4020Y
1,965,000 MB/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
362.8 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 4020Y
2,197
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
1,689
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 4020Y
833
Atom x5 x5-Z8500
502
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4020Y | vs | Atom x5 x5-Z8500 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.44 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 9.34W | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Core i3 4020Y | vs | Atom x5 x5-Z8500 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.24 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 1.44 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 2.24 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4200 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core i3 4020Y ![]() | Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8500 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
Intel Core M3-6Y30 vs i3 4020Y | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | $281 | |
Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700 vs Core i3 4020Y | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core M 5Y10 vs i3 4020Y | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $27 | |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs x5-Z8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$27 | ||
Intel Atom Z3775 vs x5 x5-Z8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$27 | ||
Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $27 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs x5 x5-Z8500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||