Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4010U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4010U

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 28.54 pt/W vs 1.42 pt/W Around 20.2x better performance per watt
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 1.52 pt/$ vs 0.63 pt/$ Around 2.5x better performance per dollar
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,394 vs 2,097 More than 60% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,630 vs 1,196 More than 35% better geekbench 3 single core score
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron B810E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B810E

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz 3.2x higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4010U vs Celeron B810E

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4010U
2,175,000 MB/s
Celeron B810E
78.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4010U  vs
Celeron B810E 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 28.54 pt/W 1.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 4010U  vs
Celeron B810E 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,998.4 MB
Intel Core i3 4010U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron B810E
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus