0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 4010U vs AMD G G-T56E |
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4010U
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4010U
![]() | Much better performance per watt 28.54 pt/W | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 936 | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD G G-T56E
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD G G-T56E
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 4010UCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 28.54 pt/W | vs | 2.23 pt/W | More than 12.8x better performance per watt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 936 | vs | 441 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 90 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better PassMark score | 2,443 | vs | 751 | More than 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date over a year later | |||
| |||||||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4010U vs G G-T56E
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 4010U
2,443
G G-T56E
751
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 4010U
936
G G-T56E
441
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4010U | vs | G G-T56E |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core i3 4010U | vs | G G-T56E |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.7 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.7 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 28.54 pt/W | 2.23 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 14.63W |
Intel Core i3 4010U ![]() | AMD G G-T56E ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $281 | |
N2840 vs 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6310 vs 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
4200U vs 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $281 | |
N2940 vs 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $281 | |
3217U vs 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $281 | |
3110M vs 4010U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||