Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4005U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4005U

Report a correction
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better turbo clock speed 950 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 20% better turbo clock speed
Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.74 fps vs 0.51 fps Around 45% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score
Higher GPU clock speed 200 MHz vs 100 MHz 2x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Better performance per dollar 1.64 pt/$ vs 0.16 pt/$ Around 10.5x better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.85 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 30.05 pt/W vs 5.71 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 3205U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3205U

Report a correction
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4005U vs Celeron 3205U

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i3 4005U
10.07 mPixels/s
Celeron 3205U
6.12 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
132.16 fps
Celeron 3205U
89 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
0.74 fps
Celeron 3205U
0.51 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
7.27 fps
Celeron 3205U
-1 fps

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4005U  vs
Celeron 3205U 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 15W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.61 $/year
Performance per watt 30.05 pt/W 5.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 12.19W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 4005U  vs
Celeron 3205U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.85 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.85 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD 4400 series Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 100 MHz
Turbo clock speed 950 MHz 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i3 4005U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3205U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus