0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Atom C2508 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4005U
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 4005U
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Higher clock speed 1.7 GHz |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.81 GHz |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom C2508
- 1.25 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2508
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 7.72W |
![]() | Newer Apr, 2014 | ![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.29 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1.7 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.81 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.7 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 7.72W | vs | 12.19W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date 9 months later | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.29 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.32 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core i3 4005U vs Atom C2508
clock speed
Core i3 4005U
1.7 GHz
Atom C2508
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core i3 4005U
1.81 GHz
Atom C2508
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core i3 4005U
1.7 GHz
Atom C2508
1.25 GHz
TDP
Core i3 4005U
15W
Atom C2508
9.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 4005U | vs | Atom C2508 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 9.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 2.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 8.32 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 7.72W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core i3 4005U | vs | Atom C2508 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.81 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.7 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.81 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | HD 4400 series | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Core i3 4005U ![]() | Intel Atom C2508 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $275 | |
5005U vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $275 | |
N3050 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
7110 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
4405U vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
6410 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $275 | |
4030U vs 4005U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||