CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4005U vs 8700P among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 4005U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 4005U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4005U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4005U

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 28.25 pt/W vs 11.59 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 3 MB vs None Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
Front view of AMD A10 for AIOs 8700P

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 for AIOs 8700P

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 800 MHz vs 200 MHz 4x higher GPU clock speed
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 14.45 fps vs 7.27 fps Around 2x better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,402 vs 3,389 Around 30% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 4005U vs A10 for AIOs 8700P

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
8.53 mHash/s
A10 for AIOs 8700P
57.84 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i3 4005U
12.5 mPixels/s
A10 for AIOs 8700P
11.66 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
132.16 fps
A10 for AIOs 8700P
111.79 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
0.74 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 4005U
7.27 fps
A10 for AIOs 8700P
14.45 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 4005U
2,180,000 MB/s
A10 for AIOs 8700P
1,570 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4005U  vs
A10 for AIOs 8700P 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3

details

Core i3 4005U  vs
A10 for AIOs 8700P 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB None
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD 4400 series Radeon™ R6
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 800 MHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 15W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 28.25 pt/W 11.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 12.19W
Intel Core i3 4005U
Report a correction
AMD A10 for AIOs 8700P
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus