Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 4000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4000M

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 30.06W vs 52.81W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 32.41 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 E2-3250

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 E2-3250

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E2 E2-3250 vs the Intel Core i3 4000M.

Features Key features of the Core i3 4000M  vs E2 E2-3250 

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 4000M  vs
E2 E2-3250 
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i3 4000M  vs
E2 E2-3250 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 37W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 32.41 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 30.06W 52.81W
Intel Core i3 4000M
Report a correction
AMD E2 E2-3250
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus