CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 380M vs 1005M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

0.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 380M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 380M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 380M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 380M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 380M vs the Celeron 1005M.

Front view of Intel Celeron 1005M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1005M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 1005M vs the Core i3 380M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 380M vs Celeron 1005M

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 380M
0.62 mHash/s
Celeron 1005M
3.35 mHash/s

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 380M
106,200 MB/s
Celeron 1005M
99,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 380M  vs
Celeron 1005M 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 2.98 pt/W 2.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 380M  vs
Celeron 1005M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.59 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.53 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.59 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 667 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1600
DDR3RS-1333
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 17,066.66 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i3 380M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1005M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus