Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 370M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 370M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 370M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 370M

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,009 vs 2,038 Around 50% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 313 MHz Around 60% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,452 vs 667 Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.39 pt/$ Around 35% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron N2910

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2910

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 28.44W 4.7x lower typical power consumption
Better turbo clock speed 756 MHz vs 667 MHz Around 15% better turbo clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 5.6 pt/W vs 3.12 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jun, 2010 Release date over 3 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 4.7x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 4.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 370M vs Celeron N2910

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 370M
101,000 MB/s
Celeron N2910
37,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 370M  vs
Celeron N2910 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 1.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 6.57 $/year
Performance per watt 3.12 pt/W 5.6 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 6.09W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 370M  vs
Celeron N2910 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 1.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 313 MHz
Turbo clock speed 667 MHz 756 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 17,066.66 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 9,000.96 MB
Intel Core i3 370M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2910
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus