Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 350M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 350M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,857 vs 983 Around 3x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,000 vs 1,078 More than 2.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,381 vs 1,086 More than 25% better geekbench 3 single core score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jan, 2010 vs Aug, 2008 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 450

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz vs 2.26 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 350M vs Celeron M 450

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 350M
95,000 MB/s
Celeron M 450
92,100 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 350M  vs
Celeron M 450 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
M
BGA 1288
478
LGA 775
Slot 1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.97 pt/W 2.63 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 350M  vs
Celeron M 450 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 17 11

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.26 GHz 3.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 3.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 500 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 667 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i3 350M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus