CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3240 vs 2120


Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)


How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more


Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Intel Core i3 3240 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3240  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Intel Core i3 3240

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 3240

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3240

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3240

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark (Overclocked) score 3,313.1 vs 1,336.7 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Overclocked) score
Better performance per dollar 7.39 pt/$ vs 4.73 pt/$ More than 55% better performance per dollar
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 10.75 pt/W vs 8.55 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i3 2120

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2120

Report a correction
Higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 30% higher GPU clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 5% better turbo clock speed
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 69.1 °C vs 65.3 °C More than 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3240 vs 2120

GeekBench (32-bit)

GeekBench (64-bit)


3D Mark 11 (Physics)


Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i3 3240  vs
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes Yes


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 65W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 10.75 pt/W 8.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 52.81W


Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s


Core i3 3240  vs
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 34 33
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 69.1°C


Overclock popularity 1 22
Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz 3.3 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,313.1 1,336.7
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz 3.44 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i3 3240
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2120
Report a correction

Read more


comments powered by Disqus