CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3240 vs 1200

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3240

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3240

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,760 vs 374 Around 4.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz vs 1.42 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Better PassMark score 4,313 vs 692 Around 6.2x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 5,558 vs 906 Around 6.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.61 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better performance per watt 11.47 pt/W vs 6.79 pt/W Around 70% better performance per watt
Marginally newer Sep, 2012 vs Jun, 2012 Release date 2 months later
Front view of AMD E1 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1200

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum Operating Temperature 100 °C vs 65.3 °C Around 55% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 44.69W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3240 vs E1 1200

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i3 3240
5,558
E1 1200
906

GeekBench

Core i3 3240
6,895
E1 1200
1,310

Passmark (Single Core)

Core i3 3240
1,760
E1 1200
374

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3240  vs
E1 1200 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Radeon™ HD 7310

details

Core i3 3240  vs
E1 1200 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.52 GHz 1.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.61 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz 1.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 55W 18W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 11.47 pt/W 6.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 14.63W
Intel Core i3 3240
Report a correction
AMD E1 1200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus