Intel Core i3 3227U vs 3217U |
If you're a person who's always on the go, you'll need an ultraportable laptop. It's lighter than the average laptop and is geared towards portability and long lasting battery life. For this match up, we’re comparing two of those processors: the Intel Core i3 3227U versus the Intel Core i3 3217U, to see which has better performance.
The 3227U and 3217U are similar in more ways than one. Essentially, both are dual Core chips with 3 MB of cache. Fortunately, they're also hyperthreaded which results to more efficient use of each processor core. They also have great battery life because of a low power consumption of 17W TDP.
Their main difference lies in the clock speed: the 3227U is clocked at 1.9 GHz, while the 3217U is clocked at 1.8 GHz. The question is, does this 100 MHz difference matter when it comes to real world usage?
Yes; benchmarks show that the 3227U is the faster processor. In the PassMark single core test, it's around 16% faster, while the Geekbench and 3DMark benchmarks show the same performance increase of at least 10%. Despite the obvious difference in performance, it's surprising that they are similarly priced at $225, which leads to the conclusion that the 3227U offers the better bang for the buck.
Wrapping things up, when it comes to budget ultraportable CPUs, we recommend the higher model because it offers better performance. For this match up, choose the Intel Core i3 3227U over the Intel Core i3 3217U to power your ultraportable laptop.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 3227U vs the 3217U. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 3217U vs the 3227U. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3227U vs 3217U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3227U | vs | 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.9 pt/W | 6.98 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i3 3227U | vs | 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 19 | 18 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3RS-1600 | |||
| DDR3RS-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
 Intel Core i3 3227U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 3217U Report a correction |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 1 laptop with the Intel Core i3 3227U, starting from $489
- 32 laptops with the Intel Core i3 3217U, starting from $319
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2830 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E1 6010 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $80 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E2 6110 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E1 2100 vs Intel Core i3 3227U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
