Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3227U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 3227U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3227U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3227U

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 32 vs 17.2 More than 85% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,133 vs 1,244 More than 2.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 756 MHz More than 45% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,530 vs 756 More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark score 2,455 vs 774 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 313 MHz More than 10% higher GPU clock speed
Slightly better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.47 pt/$ More than 10% better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Celeron N2810

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2810

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 13.81W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 5 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3227U vs Celeron N2810

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3227U
99,400 MB/s
Celeron N2810
46,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3227U  vs
Celeron N2810 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 313 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 756 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i3 3227U  vs
Celeron N2810 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.9 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.9 GHz 2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 6.57 $/year
Performance per watt 6.9 pt/W 6.65 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 6.09W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i3 3227U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2810
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus