Winner
Intel Core i3 3225
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3225 based on its .
See full details Intel Core i3 3225 vs AMD Athlon II X2 215 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3225
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
7.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3225
 | Much more l3 cache 3 MB | | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
Released September, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 215
- 2.7 GHz
- Dual core
2.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 215
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74 °C | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.56 GHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.79 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3225 vs 215 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Sep, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.56 GHz | vs | 3.49 GHz | Almost the same | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.79 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3225 vs Athlon II X2 215
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3225 | vs | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.97 pt/W | 1.62 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W | |
details | Core i3 3225 | vs | Athlon II X2 215 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.49 GHz | 3.56 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | 3.79 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.49 GHz | 3.56 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
 Intel Core i3 3225  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon II X2 215 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $112 | ||
| 3225 vs 50 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $112 | $125 | |
| 3225 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $112 | $130 | |
| 3225 vs 3240 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $112 | $180 | |
| 3225 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $145 | ||
| 215 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $105 | ||
| 215 vs 2430M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 215 vs 965 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
